Tips and secrets on hunting


Horse Art - Eadweard Muybridge, Leland Stanford, and the Hobby Horse

A collaboration between an English-bornairborne during the canter. The unaided human
eccentric Eadweard Muybridge and the foundereye could not resolve that question.Eadweard
of one of our great universities resulted inMuybridgeEnter Muybridge. With a tempestuous
a series of events which spelled the end ofpersonality, sporting a Walt Whitman beard,
the "hobby-horse" posture in horse art andand carrying on in the grand tradition of the
paintings.Towards the end of the 19thEnglish eccentric, it was said of Eadweard
century, an event occurred whichMuybridge that had he never been born a
significantly changed the world of horse art,novelist would have created him. Coming to
in particular paintings but for sculpture asAmerica from England at an early age,
well. Until that time period, most paintingsMuybridge established a reputation as one of
of horses at full gallop showed the frontSan Francisco's great 19th century landscape
legs extended forward and the hind legsphotographers. Over time, his interests
extended to the rear. Unless a horse's motionnarrowed and became focused upon
was to be similar to that of a rabbits's,photographing and studying the motion of
this position would be anatomicallyanimals and people.Muybridge and Stanford met
impossible. This posture by the way, is oftenin 1873 at which time Muybridge began to
referred to as the rocking horse orphotograph Stanford's horses in motion. It
hobby-horse posture. Can you image trying toshould be noted that at that time
stay in the saddle if a horse's motion wasphotographers often built their own equipment
the same as a rabbit's? It would be anand mixed their own chemicals. Exposure time
adventure to say the least.Pleasure ridingwas usually measured in seconds rather than
would be restricted to the walk, perhaps thein tenths, much less one-hundredths of a
slow trot. Canter? Forget it! Driving? Onesecond. Up to that time no photographer had
horse or a team. Picture the effect if horsesbeen able to capture events too rapid to be
ran like rabbits. It would likely shake theseen by the naked eye.The two worked together
buggy apart in a short distance. Yet this wasfor nearly ten years. During that time
how horses at full gallop were generallyMuybridge continually improved and refined
portrayed.If you've ever tried to figure outhis photographic processes. By 1877,
the motion (or gait) of a horse, or a dog orMuybridge, in collaboration with Leland
cat for that matter at a walk, with a littleStanford's engineering staff was able to
concentration you'll soon figure out thephotograph movement with a shutter speed of 1
order in which the legs moved and when a hoof2000th of a second. It was here that he
(or paw) leaves or touches the ground withprovided conclusive proof that the horse did
respect to the position of the other legs.have all four hooves off the ground during
At a trot - more difficult but possible. Butthe gallop.What was key to the world of horse
at a gallop or run - forget it (I've triedart was found in the photographs which
this walking behind our beagle) - the legsshowed every aspect of the horses' gait. The
move faster than our eyes are capable ofphotos showed that, at full gallop, all four
tracking. It's little wonder that until thehooves were for an instant under the horse
advent of photography there was a great dealand off the ground.In The Art of the Horse
of guesswork as to how a horse actually movedby John Fairley there is a reproduction of a
at a canter or gallop.One artist who had awonderful painting depicting the chariot
clue was the Englishman whose meticulousraces at the Circus Maximus. It is an
studies of the horse's anatomy gave him animmensely realistic and powerful painting.
understanding as to what motion was possibleHowever, every horse under full gallop has
and what was not.The "Farm"Leland Stanfordboth front legs extended forward and both
(1824-1893) - railroad executive, governer,hind legs extended to the rear. If that were
senator, pioneer in California's winethe case it would be amazing if the
industry and founder of Stanfordcharioteer could stay aboard for even one
University, was also a breeder and trainer oflap!When Muybridge's results became generally
horses. His farm (the Palo Alto Stock Farm)known (largely through publication in
was one of the finest for trotting horses inScientific American in 1878) they were
the United States and in the 1880's andreadily accepted by artists such as Degas,
1890's home to 600 horses and 150 trainersEakins, George Stubbs and Remington. Others,
and staff. The "Farm" eventually became thelike Rodin had to go through a period of
site of Stanford University.The farm ( and"furious denial" before finally abandoning
later the city) was named after one ofthe "rocking horse" style. Muybridge
Stanford's great trotting horses, Palo Alto.continued his work up until his death in
The horse was in turn named after the first1904. Like English painter John Stubbs'
major battlefield victory of the Mexican War.studies of the anatomy of the horse,
Stanford's trotters won numerous trophies andMuybridge's work had a profound influence on
ribbons and several were credited with worldequine art. The artist could now study
record times. In his quest to breed thedetail that the human eye could not see.His
fastest possible trotters Stanford had awork with Stanford attracted the attention of
great interest in learning more and moreThomas Edison and, together with George
about them, including details of the gait.Eastmans ongoing work in the development of
One of the controversies at the time wasfilm, set the stage for motion pictures.
whether or not a horse ever was completely



1 A B C D E F 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137