To Hunt Or Not to Hunt? That is the Question

To hunt, or not to hunt? That is the question (and aNeedless to say that the elephant pressure, in this
very tough one indeed...)! The issue is extremelycase, is having drastic effects on the local ecosystem
controversial, and can be associated with anotherand surroundings!
concern: is hunting good, or bad?* Competition with humans and resources.
If you take the two extremes of the spectrum,Overall, hunting can be used as a plague control, for
animal rights activists ("anti-hunters") will tell you thatanimals seen as a nuisance (varmint hunting) or to
it is a total disgrace. On the other hand, for a numberkeep a proper balance in nature. The latter is
of reasons hunters will claim it should be allowed.especially relevant to farmers, who get increasingly
Both parties have their arguments (sometimes verysolicited by wild animals that trespass their properties,
pertinent ones), so the idea here is not to point thecause harm or ruin their crops!
finger at someone but rather to look at both sidesWhen Hunting Becomes a Sport
of the debate and to highlight some of the things* Trophy hunting is becoming extremely popular,
that need to be enlightened further.especially in the West.
When Hunting is a Necessity* Hunting is seen by many enthusiasts as a "fun"
* For food/in order to survive.activity.
While this argument is no longer as persuasive as it* Killing the "largest", "most dangerous" and "rarest"
used to be (nowadays most of us go to theanimal species is all part of the competition.
supermarket for food), some people (local tribes or* Heads or pelts of the animals are seen as a sign of
farmers...) still rely on hunting practices to survive. In"prowess", and hunters "courageously" smile in front
their case, hunting is more than legitimate: it's aof the camera with their "well-deserved" prize.
necessity for their own good!Hunting Ethics
* Impact on the environment and birth control.From the hunter's perspective, hunting is good
In other instances, the proliferation of animal speciesbecause:
has become such that it has reached its carrying- It contributes to wildlife in taxes.
capacity. In order to counteract this phenomenon,- It generates income for local communities.
animal population can either be contained through- It is part of human nature. Animals do not possess
sterilization, by relocating it, or by culling/killing it.rights as we see them, and therefore can be killed.
Unfortunately, in most situations hunting is by far theFrom the animal activists' point of view however,
least expensive and most effective way of dealinghunting is not ethical:
with the problem.- Animals never asked to be part of the
Let me give you a practical example to illustrate this."competition".
For my 20th birthday, I was fortunate enough to- It might be "fun" to hunt, but not to be hunted.;)
visit one of Botswana's most impressive gameCanned Hunting: When Hunting Crosses the Border
reserves: Chobe. Chobe National Park is renowned forLine!
having the highest concentration of elephants inA canned hunt, or canned hunting, refers to a hunting
Africa! Wonder how many they are? Over 50 000!practice whereby the hunter is almost certain to get
Yes, you heard me right: 50 000 pachydermsits trophy as the animals are being confined in a small
wandering about in this precious piece of Eden!:)area (such as fenced-in enclosures). According to
While this statistic is encouraging for the overallWikipedia, it is a "hunt for animals that have been
African elephant population, the story locally israised on game ranches and farms until they are
somewhat different. And boy, did I figure it out formature enough to be killed for trophy collections".
myself! Most of the trees in the area had either beenIt is a huge business, and some wealthy tourists are
uprooted by the animals, or looked nothing like "real"prepared to pay enormous amounts of money to kill
healthy trees any longer. "Lunar", that's how thea lion ($25,000 per cat or more...) or fell a rhino with a
landscape almost felt like!bow and arrow.